4.7 Article

Self-reconstruction strategy to synthesis of Ni/Co-OOH nanoflowers decorated with N, S co-doped carbon for high-performance energy storage

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 396, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125323

关键词

In-situ electrochemical activation; Transition metal oxyhydroxides; Self-reconstruction; Pseudocapacitive materials; Supercapacitors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21908245, 21776308]
  2. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [2462018YJRC009]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Well-designed structures with sufficient electroactive sites are vital for pseudocapacitive materials to yield high performances. Herein, we propose a facile electrochemical activation strategy to synthesize Ni/Co oxyhydroxides nanoflowers decorated with N, S co-doped carbon fragments (Ni/Co-OOH/NSCF). The applied-voltage can rapidly induce significant structural transformation of pristine Ni/Co sulfides particles into Ni/Co-OOH nanoflowers. Moreover, this evolution process endows the thin nanoflakes with abundant pores. Benefiting from the massively exposed active sites, rich mixed valences of bimetals, and high-speed electron/ion transport pathways, the Ni/Co-OOH/NSCF exhibits an excellent capacity of 237 mAh g(-1) (equalling 853 C g(-1)) at 1 A g(-1) and high rate capability of 61% at 20 A g(-1) even at a high mass loading of 7 mg cm(-2). The assembled asymmetric supercapacitor based on Ni/Co-OOH/NSCF delivers a superior energy density of 94.3 Wh kg(-1) at the power density of 3.6 kW kg(-1), and excellent stability of 90% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles, which outperforms most of reported transition metal compounds. This general synthetic method can be facilely realized without using any reagents and tedious procedures. Therefore, this work opens a new avenue for the structure manipulation of advanced materials toward energy storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据