4.6 Article

Vanadium Hydride as an Ammonia Synthesis Catalyst

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 191-195

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202001084

关键词

ammonia synthesis; Haber-Bosch process; vanadium; niobium; hydride

资金

  1. JSPS [JP16H06439]
  2. PRESTO program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJPR1441]
  3. CREST program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJCR1421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early transition metals V and Nb show enhanced catalytic activity through hydride diffusion due to their body-centered cubic (bcc) related structures and relatively lower M-N bond strengths. The activity of vanadium hydride surpasses previously reported hydrogenated titanium and is comparable to TiH2 and Cs-Ru/MgO at 400°C under 5 MPa. These findings suggest potential for developing new single-phase hydride catalysts for previously overlooked elements without compromising activity levels.
Early 3d transition metals, such as Ti, V, or Nb are known to be inactive for the Haber-Bosch process, due to their strong M-N bonds. However, recently some hydride compounds have been found to effectively counteract this effect, imparting catalytic activity on a wide range of elements. With these hydride catalysts, hydride (and nitride) bulk diffusion mechanisms have been proposed; if so, more open structures should enhance their activity. Here, we expand the study to hydrides of other early transition metals, V and Nb. These metals benefit from body-centered cubic (bcc) related structures which enhance hydride diffusion, in addition to having relatively lower M-N bond strengths. The activity of vanadium hydride, most likely with an active composition of VH0.44N0.16, is superior to the previously reported BaTiO2.5H0.5, and comparable to TiH2 and Cs-Ru/MgO at 400 degrees C under 5 MPa. These results show that there is more potential for developing new single-phase hydride catalysts of previously overlooked elements without sacrificing activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据