4.7 Article

Ghost attractors in blinking Lorenz and Hindmarsh-Rose systems

期刊

CHAOS
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0021230

关键词

-

资金

  1. RSF [19-12-00367, 19-72-10128]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [0729-2020-0036]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [19-12-00367, 19-72-10128] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we consider blinking systems, i.e., non-autonomous systems generated by randomly switching between several autonomous continuous time subsystems in each sequential fixed period of time. We study cases where a non-stationary attractor of a blinking system with fast switching unexpectedly differs from the attractors of composing subsystems. Such a non-stationary attractor is associated with an attractor of the averaged system being a ghost attractor of the blinking system [Belykhet al., Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom.195, 188 (2004); Hasleret al., SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.12, 1031 (2013); Belykhet al., Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.222, 2497 (2013)]. Validating the theory of stochastically blinking systems [Hasleret al., SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.12, 1031 (2013); Hasleret al., SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.12, 1007 (2013)], we demonstrate that fast switching between two Lorenz systems yields a ghost chaotic attractor, even though the dynamics of both systems are trivial and defined by stable equilibria. We also study a blinking Hindmarsh-Rose system obtained from the original model of neuron activity by using randomly switching sequence as an external stimulus. Despite the fact that the values of the external stimulus are selected from a set corresponding to the tonic spiking mode, the blinking model exhibits bursting activity. For both systems, we analyze changes in the dynamical behavior as the period of stochastic switching increases. Using a numerical approximation of the invariant measures of the blinking and averaged systems, we give estimates of a non-stationary and ghost attractors' proximity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据