4.7 Article

Highly efficient green synthesis of highly pure microporous nanosilica from silicomanganese slag

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 2222-2229

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.062

关键词

SiO2; Powders: chemical preparation; Porosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High purity nanosilica was successfully synthesized from silicomanganese slag through a facile hydrometallurgy-based method, resulting in a purity of over 99% and a specific surface area of 474 m(2) g(-1). Characterization of the extracted silica proved the efficiency of the method in treating slag, using fewer chemicals, and being an environmentally friendly production process.
Highly pure nanosilica was synthesized through a facile hydrometallurgy-based method from silicomanganese slag as a low cost silica source. The synthesis route included short-term nitric acid dissolution at room temperature, gelation, washing, drying, and calcination steps. The experimental dissolution conditions resulted in a dissolution efficiency of 98%. The crystalline structure, chemical composition, chemical bonding, microstructure and elemental analyses, particle size distribution, and surface area of the extracted silica were then studied by appropriate characterization techniques. The characterization findings indicated that the amorphous silica particles had a microporous nature with an average particle size of similar to 24 nm, exhibiting a high purity of more than 99% and a high specific surface area of similar to 474 m(2) g(-1). The overall results indicated that the proposed synthesis route is a promising feasible alternative method to produce highly pure microporous nanosilica from a low cost secondary resource. The proposed method can treat 98% of the slag and uses less chemicals than conventional methods and is therefore a greener nanosilica production process. The current process also competes with the traditional process and other recently introduced processes in terms of process economy and the quality of the produced product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据