4.7 Article

Improving hardness and toughness of plasma sprayed Ti-Si-C nano-composite coatings by post Ar-annealing

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 3173-3184

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.154

关键词

Plasma spraying; Ti3SiC2; Nano-composite coating; Microstructure; Fracture toughness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51701062, 51872073]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2020202110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ti-Si-C composite coatings were fabricated by plasma spraying using Ti/Si/graphite agglomerates as feedstock. Ar-annealing was carried out to enhance the performance of the coatings. The coatings showed improved mechanical properties after annealing, with increased hardness, fracture toughness, and a uniform microstructure.
Ti-Si-C (TSC) composite coatings were fabricated by plasma spraying using Ti/Si/graphite agglomerates as feedstock. Ar-annealing was carried out to reduce the intrinsic defects and increase the performance of the as-sprayed TSC coating. The effects of the annealing temperature (500-900 degrees C) on the microstructures and mechanical performances of the TSC coatings were investigated. All TSC coatings consisted of TiC, Ti5Si3 and MAX phase Ti3SiC2. With the increase in temperature (>700 degrees C), TiC became predominant, while the Ti3SiC2 phase content increased, which was accompanied by a decrease in Ti5Si3 content. The high-temperature annealing (>700 degrees C) led to a homogenous microstructure with a relatively low porosity and increased number of micro-cracks. Notably, the hardness and fracture toughness of the TSC coating were simultaneously increased after the annealing, from 1164 HV to 1.96 MPa m(1/2) to 1560 HV and 3.45 MPa m(1/2), respectively. The formation of nanoscale TiC and Ti5Si3 with a network distribution, uniform and dense microstructure, and toughening effects of Ti3SiC2 and micro-cracks provided the high mechanical performances of the TSC composite coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据