4.7 Article

Wet abrasive wear behavior of WC-based cermet coatings prepared by HVOF spraying

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 1829-1836

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.009

关键词

WC-based cermet coatings; Wet abrasive wear; HVOF spraying; Sediment concentration; Applied load

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51579087, 51979083]
  2. Opening Project of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials and Application Technology [ASMA201902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the WC-CoCr coating exhibited the highest microhardness and the best abrasive wear resistance. Increasing applied load or sediment concentration led to higher wear rates for all coatings.
In this study, three kinds of WC-based cermet coatings including WC-CoCr coating, WC-Ni coating and WC-Cr3C2-Ni coating were prepared by the high-velocity oxygen-fuel (HVOF) spraying process. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS) and Vickers hardness tester were used to analyze the microstructure and mechanical properties of these coatings. The WC-CoCr coating presented the highest average microhardness of 1205 HV0.3, and then followed by the WC-Cr3C2-Ni coating (1188 HV0.3) and the WC-Ni coating (1105 HV0.3). The abrasive wear behavior of the WC-based coatings under the conditions of different applied loads and sediment concentrations were studied by a wet sand-rubber wheel tester. The results indicated that the abrasive wear loss rates of all the coatings increased with the increment of applied load or sediment concentration. In addition, the coatings with higher microhardness appeared to have higher abrasive wear resistance. The abrasive wear resistance of the WC-based coatings was 4-90 times higher than that of AISI 304 stainless steel under the same testing condition. The abrasive wear mechanism of the WC-based coatings was deduced to be the extrusion and removal of binder phases, as well as the fragmentation and peel-off of hard phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据