4.7 Article

Heterojunction photocatalyst for organic degradation: Superior photocatalytic activity through the phase and interface engineering

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 14, 页码 23245-23256

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.317

关键词

beta-Bi2O3/CeO2; Heterostructure photocatalyst; Mechanochemical; Stabilization of beta-Bi2O3; Degradation efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51974378]
  2. Scientific and Technological Breakthrough and Major Achievements Transformation of Strategic Emerging Industries of Hunan Province [2018GK4001]
  3. Hunan Key Laboratory for Rare Earth Functional Materials [2017TP1031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semiconductor-based heterostructure photocatalyst attracts extensive attention because of its excellent interface charge transfer/separation ability. Here, the beta-Bi2O3/CeO2 heterostructure photocatalysts are fabricated via a simple mechanochemical couple with thermal decomposition strategy. The introduction of CeO2 can not only stabilize the phase of beta-Bi2O3/CeO2 but also construct a heterojunction at the interface, resulting in the improved visible light response capability and efficient transfer and separation of photo-generated charges. Besides, the increased specific surface area and pore volume increase the active sites to accelerate the adsorption and mass transfer process. As a result, the beta-Bi2O3/CeO2 heterostructure photocatalyst shows remarkably enhanced photocatalytic performance towards malachite green (MG) degradation under visible-light irradiation compared with the Bi2O3 and CeO2. The degradation efficiency of MG over the optimized beta-Bi2O3/CeO2 heterostructure reaches up to 97.5% after 2 h of visible-light irradiation. This work provides a new approach for the rational design of heterojunction photocatalyst combined with phase and interface engineering and opens up a potential avenue for efficient application of Bi2O3 photocatalyst for efficient energy conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据