4.7 Article

Atomic layer deposition of Cu2O on NH2-MIL-101(Fe) for enhanced photocatalytic performance and decreased electron/hole recombination

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 13291-13300

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.239

关键词

Atomic layer deposition; Cu2O; Metal-organic frameworks; Photocatalytic degradation; NH2-MIL-101(Fe); Electron/hole recombination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully dispersed ultrafine Cu2O nanoparticles on metal-organic frameworks using the ALD approach to form NH2-MIL-101(Fe)/Cu2O nanocomposite photocatalysts, addressing the aggregation issue of nanoparticles. The optimal NH2-MIL-101 (Fe)/Cu2O exhibited high photodegradation efficiency and excellent stability under visible light.
Coupling appropriate semiconductor nanoparticles with massive surface-area support has become a promising but challenging strategy to photocatalyst design for enhanced photocatalytic activity in environmental cleaning applications, owing to the severe aggregation issues of nanoparticles. Herein, the atomic layer deposition (ALD) approach was applied to uniformly disperse ultrafine Cu2O nanoparticles (5-10 nm) on metal-organic frameworks without aggregation, forming NH2-MIL-101(Fe)/Cu2O nanocomposite photocatalysts. The Cu2O mass within the nanocomposites can be well controlled by merely adjusting the ALD cycles. The optimal NH2-MIL-101 (Fe)/Cu2O displays a high photodegradation efficiency of 92% for RhB and excellent stability under visible light. The reaction kinetics and photocurrent response experimental results reveal that the optimal NH2-MIL-101(Fe)/Cu2O photocatalyst exhibits effective charge separation/transfer and suppressed recombination rate of charge carriers, which will significantly increase the solar light utilization efficiency and photocatalytic activity. We believe the presented photocatalyst synthesis strategy here can be generalized to construct other photocatalysts for various photocatalytic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据