4.7 Article

Quantitative Raman spectroscopy for the Ioncell(R) process: Part 2-quantification of ionic liquid degradation products and improvement of prediction performance through interval PLS

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 27, 期 17, 页码 9813-9824

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03466-2

关键词

Ioncell(R) process; Raman spectroscopy; Ionic liquid; Chemometrics

资金

  1. Aalto University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the main issues associated with ionic liquids (ILs) is their recyclability. Viable recycling concepts can only be developed if one knows what is in the IL mixtures and solutions. In our previous work, we showed that it is possible to quantify water and 1.5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-enium acetate [DBNH][OAc] IL components in liquid mixtures using Raman spectroscopy. In this regard, we considered Raman spectroscopy as a promising analytical method for the inline monitoring and control of the Ioncell(R)process. In the present work, we push the limits of this analytical method further by extending it to more complex and realistic liquid mixtures including the hydrolysis product 1-(3-aminopropyl)-2-pyrrolidone (APP) that can be formed upon the reaction of 5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene (DBN) with water. Quantifying APP is important in order to measure the extent of the hydrolysis reaction and apply the right corrective measures to reverse the reaction and to maintain the process within the optimal working conditions. The simultaneous quantification of the four components (Acetic acid, DBN, APP and H2O) in typical Ioncell(R)liquid streams is investigated using Raman spectroscopy. The sensitivity of the Raman method in quantifying APP is also highlighted in comparison with refractometry, which is widely applied to measure IL concentration in aqueous mixtures. Finally, we propose simple modifications on the multivariate partial least square regression model based on a variable selection algorithm to enhance the accuracy of the predicted calibration values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据