4.7 Article

Reengineering an Antiarrhythmic Drug Using Patient hiPSC Cardiomyocytes to Improve Therapeutic Potential and Reduce Toxicity

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 813-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.08.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01HL113601, R01HL130840, R01HL141358, P01HL141084, R21HL141019, U01 HL131914, R01HL123483]
  2. American Heart Association [9SFRN34820006]
  3. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM grant) [TR4-06857]
  4. NIH at the Sanford-Burnham-Prebys Medical Discovery Institute [P30CA030199]
  5. Stanford Cardiovascular Institute
  6. Stanford School of Medicine funds
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [708459]
  8. Joan and Sanford Weill Scholarship Endowment
  9. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [708459] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling cardiac disorders with human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes is a new paradigm for preclinical testing of candidate therapeutics. However, disease-relevant physiological assays can be complex, and the use of hiPSC-cardiomyocyte models of congenital disease phenotypes for guiding large-scale screening and medicinal chemistry have not been shown. We report chemical refinement of the antiarrhythmic drug mexiletine via high-throughput screening of hiPSC-CMs derived from patients with the cardiac rhythm disorder long QT syndrome 3 (LQT3) carrying SCN5A sodium channel variants. Using iterative cycles of medicinal chemistry synthesis and testing, we identified drug analogs with increased potency and selectivity for inhibiting late sodium current across a panel of 7 LQT3 sodium channel variants and suppressing arrhythmic activity across multiple genetic and pharmacological hiPSC-CM models of LQT3 with diverse backgrounds. These mexiletine analogs can be exploited as mechanistic probes and for clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据