4.8 Article

Neuronal Computation Underlying Inferential Reasoning in Humans and Mice

期刊

CELL
卷 183, 期 1, 页码 228-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.035

关键词

-

资金

  1. John Fell Oxford University Press Research Fund [153/046]
  2. Junior Research Fellowship (Merton College, University of Oxford)
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MC_UU_12024/3, MC_UU_00003/4]
  4. EPSRC/MRC [EP/L016052/1]
  5. Wellcome Trust studentships [203836/Z/16/Z, 203964/Z/16/Z]
  6. Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship [WT104765MA]
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK [BB/N0059TX/1]
  8. MRC [MC_UU_12024/3, MC_UU_00003/4]
  9. Wellcome Trust [203139/Z/16/Z]
  10. Wellcome Trust [203964/Z/16/Z, 203836/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  11. BBSRC [BB/S007741/1, BB/N00597X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. MRC [MC_UU_00003/4, MC_UU_12024/3, MR/L019639/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Every day we make decisions critical for adaptation and survival. We repeat actions with known consequences. But we also draw on loosely related events to infer and imagine the outcome of entirely novel choices. These inferential decisions are thought to engage a number of brain regions; however, the underlying neuronal computation remains unknown. Here, we use a multi-day cross-species approach in humans and mice to report the functional anatomy and neuronal computation underlying inferential decisions. We show that during successful inference, the mammalian brain uses a hippocampal prospective code to forecast temporally structured learned associations. Moreover, during resting behavior, coactivation of hippocampal cells in sharp-wave/ripples represent inferred relationships that include reward, thereby joining the-dots between events that have not been observed together but lead to profitable outcomes. Computing mnemonic links in this manner may provide an important mechanism to build a cognitive map that stretches beyond direct experience, thus supporting flexible behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据