4.3 Article

Thioredoxin Decreases Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity, But Sensitizes Cancer Cell Apoptosis

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICOLOGY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 142-151

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12012-020-09605-2

关键词

Anthracycline; Doxorubicin; Cardiotoxicity; Redox-cycling; Thioredoxin; Cardiomyocytes; Chemotherapy

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL107885, HL109397, HL132953]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that cancer cells overexpressing thioredoxin (Trx) exhibit enhanced apoptosis in response to daunomycin, while cells overexpressing redox-inactive mutant Trx were not effectively killed. Furthermore, increased levels of Trx specifically potentiate anthracycline toxicity, but not with other topoisomerase II inhibitors such as etoposide.
Cardiotoxicity is a major limitation for anthracycline chemotherapy although anthracyclines are potent antitumor agents. The precise mechanism underlying clinical heart failure due to anthracycline treatment is not fully understood, but is believed to be due, in part, to lipid peroxidation and the generation of free radicals by anthracycline-iron complexes. Thioredoxin (Trx) is a small redox-active antioxidant protein with potent disulfide reductase properties. Here, we present evidence that cancer cells overexpressing Trx undergo enhanced apoptosis in response to daunomycin. In contrast, cells overexpressing redox-inactive mutant Trx were not effectively killed. However, rat embryonic cardiomyocytes (H9c2 cells) overexpressing Trx were protected against daunomycin-mediated apoptosis, but H9c2 cells with decreased levels of active Trx showed enhanced apoptosis in response to daunomycin. We further demonstrate that increased level of Trx is specifically effective in anthracycline toxicity, but not with other topoisomerase II inhibitors such as etoposide. Collectively these data demonstrate that whereas high levels of Trx protect cardiomyocytes against anthracycline toxicity, it potentiates toxicity of anthracyclines in cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据