4.7 Article

Constructing cellulose nanocrystal/graphene nanoplatelet networks in phase change materials toward intelligent thermal management

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117290

关键词

Phase change materials; Graphene nanoplatelets; Cellulose nanocrystals; Network structure; Thermal management

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province [2020YFG0099]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Chengdu [2016-GH02-00097-HZ]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682019JQ04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hybrid networks of CNCs and GNPs in PEG enhanced the shape stability of PCMs while maintaining high thermal conductivity, showing outstanding light-thermal and electro-thermal conversion capabilities. The composite PCMs could serve as temperature stabilizing components for electronic devices in extreme environments.
The hybrid networks of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were constructed in polyethylene glycol (PEG) through the common solution compounding processing, in which GNPs provided the thermally conductive path while CNCs restricted the leakage of PEG during the phase transition. The results showed that CNCs greatly enhanced the shape stability of the composite phase change materials (PCMs) while thermal conductivity was still maintained at high level. At the contents of 8 wt% (CNCs) and 4 wt% (GNPs), the enthalpy of the composite PCM was 145.5 J/g, which was 88 % of pure PEG, and the thermal conductivity was 2.018 +/- 0.067 W/m K about 563.7 % higher than that of pure PEG. Furthermore, the composite PCMs exhibited outstanding light-thermal and electro-thermal conversion capabilities. Furthermore, the composite PCMs could be designed as the temperature stabilizing component exhibiting intelligent adaptive thermal management role, providing stable temperature condition for electronic devices in extreme environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据