4.5 Article

Alectinib for relapsed or refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: An open-label phase II trial

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 111, 期 12, 页码 4540-4547

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.14671

关键词

alectinib; ALK inhibitor; anaplastic large cell lymphoma; refractory; relapse

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [14533440]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [15ck0106162h0001, 16ck0106162h0002, 17ck0106162h0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibition is expected to be a promising therapeutic strategy for ALK-positive malignancies. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of alectinib, a second-generation ALK inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). This open-label, phase II trial included patients (aged 6 years or older) with relapsed or refractory ALK-positive ALCL. Alectinib 300 mg was given orally twice a day (600 mg/d) for 16 cycles, and the duration of each cycle was 21 days. Patients who weighed less than 35 kg were given a reduced dose of alectinib of 150 mg twice a day (300 mg/d). Ten patients were enrolled, and the median age was 19.5 years (range, 6-70 years). Objective responses were documented in eight of 10 patients (80%; 90% confidence interval, 56.2-95.9), with six complete responses. The 1-year progression-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival rates were 58.3%, 70.0%, and 70.0%, respectively. The median duration of therapy was 340 days. No unexpected adverse events occurred. The most common grade 3 and higher adverse event was a decrease in neutrophil count in two patients. Alectinib showed favorable clinical activity and was well tolerated in patients with ALK-positive ALCL who had progressed on standard chemotherapy. Based on the results of the current study, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan approved alectinib for the treatment of recurrent or refractory ALK-positive ALCL in February 2020.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据