4.5 Review

Current methods in translational cancer research

期刊

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 7-30

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5

关键词

Translational research; Cancer; GEMMs; PDX; Xenograft; tumor immunology

类别

资金

  1. CPRIT grant [RR160093]
  2. DoD [12935262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advancements in pre-clinical screening tools have led to a new era in drug development, with more accurate prediction of clinical effects and adverse events for candidate therapeutic agents. However, careful evaluation is necessary to determine the individual merits of these translational research tools to provide appropriate information for clinical researchers to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner.
Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual merits of these translational research tools warrant careful evaluation in order to furnish clinical researchers with appropriate information to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner. This review assesses the predictive utility of both well-established and emerging pre-clinical methods in terms of their suitability as a screening platform for treatment response, ability to represent pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties, and lastly debates the translational limitations and benefits of these models. To this end, we will describe the current literature on cell culture, organoids,in vivomouse models, andin silicocomputational approaches. Particular focus will be devoted to discussing gaps and unmet needs in the literature as well as current advancements and innovations achieved in the field, such as co-clinical trials and future avenues for refinement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据