4.5 Article

Total body irradiation plus fludarabine compared to busulfan plus fludarabine as reduced-toxicity conditioning for patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first complete remission: a study by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 481-491

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01050-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that the use of TBI8Gy/Flu as a reduced-toxicity regimen may be beneficial for younger patients with AML undergoing allo-HCT. Conversely, older patients using TBI8Gy/Flu were associated with increased NRM incidence.
The optimal conditioning for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has not been defined so far. In this retrospective study, we compared two reduced-toxicity regimens: intravenous busulfan at a total dose of 9.6 mg/kg (3 days) + fludarabine (Bu3/Flu) and total body irradiation at a dose of 8 Gy + fludarabine (TBI8Gy/Flu). In the entire study cohort (n = 518), the probabilities of overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years for Bu3/Flu and TBI8Gy/Flu were 62% vs. 72.5% (p = 0.051), 59.5% vs. 65% (p = 0.15), 30% vs. 20% (p = 0.01), and 10% vs. 14% (p = 0.18), respectively. In multivariate model for patients <50 years old, TBI8Gy/Flu was associated with improved LFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.5,p = 0.04), OS (HR = 0.31,p = 0.004), and survival free from both graft-versus-host disease and relapse (HR = 0.55,p = 0.03), as well as tendency to reduced risk of relapse (HR = 0.53,p = 0.08). Among patients aged 50 years or older the use of TBI8Gy/Flu was associated with increased incidence of NRM (HR = 3.9,p = 0.0009), with no significant impact on other outcome measures. We conclude that the use of TBI8Gy/Flu as reduced-toxicity regimen may be advised in younger patients with AML referred for allo-HCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据