4.7 Article

Hydrogen sulphide alleviates iron deficiency by promoting iron availability and plant hormone levels inGlycine maxseedlings

期刊

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02601-2

关键词

Hydrogen sulphide (H2S); Iron assimilation; Iron deficiency; Organic acid; Plant hormones; Soybean (Glycine max)

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31501822]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2015 M580876, 2016 T90948]
  3. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [14122415, 14160516, 14177617, AoE/M-05/12, AoE/M-403/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is involved in regulating physiological processes in plants. We investigated how H2S ameliorates iron (Fe) deficiency in soybean (Glycine maxL.) seedlings. Multidisciplinary approaches including physiological, biochemical and molecular, and transcriptome methods were used to investigate the H2S role in regulating Fe availability in soybean seedlings. Results Our results showed that H2S completely prevented leaf interveinal chlorosis and caused an increase in soybean seedling biomass under Fe deficiency conditions. Moreover, H2S decreased the amount of root-bound apoplastic Fe and increased the Fe content in leaves and roots by regulating the ferric-chelate reductase (FCR) activities and Fe homeostasis- and sulphur metabolism-related gene expression levels, thereby promoting photosynthesis in soybean seedlings. In addition, H2S changed the plant hormone concentrations by modulating plant hormone-related gene expression abundances in soybean seedlings grown in Fe-deficient solution. Furthermore, organic acid biosynthesis and related genes expression also played a vital role in modulating the H2S-mediated alleviation of Fe deficiency in soybean seedlings. Conclusion Our results indicated that Fe deficiency was alleviated by H2S through enhancement of Fe acquisition and assimilation, thereby regulating plant hormones and organic acid synthesis in plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据