4.7 Article

Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic basis of fiber quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)

期刊

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02611-0

关键词

Upland cotton; Fiber quality; Genome-wide association study; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Quantitative trait locus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901580]
  2. Key Project of Science and Technology of Henan Province of China [192102110032, 182102110306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Fiber quality is an important economic trait of cotton, and its improvement is a major goal of cotton breeding. To better understand the genetic mechanisms responsible for fiber quality traits, we conducted a genome-wide association study to identify and mine fiber-quality-related quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and genes. Results In total, 42 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 31 QTLs were identified as being significantly associated with five fiber quality traits. Twenty-five QTLs were identified in previous studies, and six novel QTLs were firstly identified in this study. In the QTL regions, 822 genes were identified and divided into four clusters based on their expression profiles. We also identified two pleiotropic SNPs. The SNP locus i52359Gb was associated with fiber elongation, strength, length and uniformity, while i11316Gh was associated with fiber strength and length. Moreover, these two SNPs were nonsynonymous and located in genesGh_D09G2376andGh_D06G1908, respectively. RT-qPCR analysis revealed that these two genes were preferentially expressed at one or more stages of cotton fiber development, which was consistent with the RNA-seq data. Thus,Gh_D09G2376andGh_D06G1908may be involved in fiber developmental processes. Conclusions The findings of this study provide insights into the genetic bases of fiber quality traits, and the identified QTLs or genes may be applicable in cotton breeding to improve fiber quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据