4.7 Article

Optimizing therapy in the modern age: differences in length of maintenance therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 137, 期 2, 页码 168-177

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020007702

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health from the National Cancer Institute [R01CA193776, X01HD100702-01, U10 CA180886, U24 CA196173, 1R01 CA241452]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P50GM115279]
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  4. Cookies for Kids Cancer
  5. Children's Oncology Group Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are cured with contemporary multiagent chemotherapy regimens, which include cycles of chemotherapy over 2-3 years with CNS prophylaxis.
A majority of children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are cured with contemporary multiagent chemotherapy regimens. The high rate of survival is largely the result of 70 years of randomized clinical trials performed by international cooperative groups. Contemporary ALL therapy usually consists of cycles of multiagent chemotherapy administered over 2 to 3 years that includes central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, primarily consisting of CNS-penetrating systemic agents and intrathecal therapy. Although the treatment backbones vary among cooperative groups, the same agents are used, and the outcomes are comparable. ALL therapy typically begins with 5 to 9 months of more-intensive chemotherapy followed by a prolonged low-intensity maintenance phase. Historically, a few cooperative groups treated boys with 1 more year of maintenance therapy than girls; however, most groups treated boys and girls with equal therapy lengths. This practice arose because of inferior survival in boys with older less-intensive regimens. The extra year of therapy added significant burden to patients and families and involved short- and long-term risks that were potentially life threatening and debilitating. The Children's Oncology Group recently changed its approach as part of its current generation of trials in B-cell ALL and now treats boys and girls with the same duration of therapy. We discuss the rationale behind this change, review the data and differences in practice across cooperative groups, and provide our perspective regarding the length of maintenance therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据