4.7 Article

Neutrophils promote clearance of nuclear debris following acid-induced lung injury

期刊

BLOOD
卷 137, 期 3, 页码 392-397

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020005505

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [1R01AI099479]
  2. National Institutes of Health from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5R01HL10583402, 5T32HL07586, T32HL715041]
  3. National Institutes of Health from National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2TR001879]
  4. National Institutes of Health from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1F32HL131079-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrophils play a critical role in sterile inflammation, engulfing and degrading extracellular DNA fragments to facilitate optimal organ repair.
Neutrophils are critical mediators of host defense in pathogen-induced and sterile inflammation. Excessive neutrophil activation has been associated with increased host pathology through collateral organ damage. The beneficial aspects of neutrophil activation, particularly in sterile inflammation, are less well defined. We observed accumulation of nuclear debris in the lungs of neutropenic mice exposed to acid-induced injury compared with wild type. Size analysis of DNA debris showed that neutropenic mice were unable to degrade extracellular DNA fragments. In addition, we found that neutrophils are able to differentially express DNA-degrading and repair-associated genes and proteins. Once neutrophils are at sites of lung inflammation, they are able to phagocytose and degrade extracellular DNA. This neutrophil-dependent DNA degradation occurs in a MyD88-dependent pathway. The increased DNA debris in neutropenic mice was associated with dysregulated alveolar repair and the phenotype is rescued by intratracheal administration of DNase I. Thus, we show a novel mechanism as part of the inflammatory response, in which neutrophils engulf and degrade extracellular DNA fragments and allow for optimal organ repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据