4.5 Article

Reaction coupling separation for isosteviol production from stevioside catalyzed by acidic ion-exchange resin

期刊

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 151-159

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-020-02431-4

关键词

Isosteviol; Stevioside; Hydrolysis; Cation-exchange resin; Anticancer; Ionic liquid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772017, 31371837]
  2. national first-class discipline program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering [LITE2018-03]
  3. project of outstanding scientific & technological innovation group of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isosteviol can be efficiently prepared from stevioside using an in-situ separation-coupling-reaction method, which shows promising inhibition effects on tumor cells. Acidic ion-exchange resins demonstrate higher specificity for isosteviol production compared to other acids and ionic liquids.
Isosteviol, a prodrug used to be obtained via Wagner-Meerwein rearrangement from steviol with low yield and long reaction time. Herein, an in-situ separation-coupling-reaction is presented to prepare isosteviol from the natural sweetener stevioside. Simply with in-situ water-washing, the product containing 92.98% purity of isosteviol was obtained with a stevioside conversion of 97.23% from a packet bed reactor without further separation. Within the assayed inorganic acid, organic acids and acidic ionic liquids, the acidic ion-exchange resins provided higher product specificity towards isosteviol. Furthermore, comparing to 5-Fluorouracil, the product presented similar and even stronger inhibition on proliferation of the assayed human cancer cells in a time and dose-dependence by causing cell phase arrest. Isosteviol treatment caused G1 arrest on SGC-7901, HCT-8 and HCT-116 cells, S arrest on HepG2, Huh-7 and HepG3B cells, and G2 arrest on MGC-803 cells, respectively. Graphic abstract Reaction coupling separation for isosteviol production catalyzed by acidic ion-exchange resin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据