4.3 Review

Prognostic association of routinely measured biomarkers in patients admitted to critical care: a systematic review

期刊

BIOMARKERS
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 1-12

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1842498

关键词

Systematic reviews; intensive care; biomarker; mortality; length of stay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined 128 studies and found associations between parameters like red cell distribution width, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and platelet count with mortality and length of stay in critical care patients. Most studies used regression modeling, but none validated the proposed predictive models.
Purpose To examine reported prognostic associations of routine blood measurements in the intensive care unit. Materials and methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE through 28(th) May 2020 to identify all studies in adult critical care investigating associations between parameters measured routinely in whole blood, plasma or serum, and length of stay or mortality. Registration: PROSPERO; CRD42019122058. Results A total of 128 studies, reporting 28 different putative prognostic biomarkers, met eligibility criteria. Those most frequently examined were red cell distribution width, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and platelet count. A higher red cell distribution width, a lower platelet count, and a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were consistently associated with both increased mortality and length of stay. A lower level of albumin was consistently associated with greater mortality. C-reactive protein was inconsistent. Most studies (n = 110) used regression modelling with wide variation in variable selection and covariate-adjustment; none externally validated the proposed predictive models. Conclusions Simple regression models have so far proved inadequate for the complexity of data available from routine blood sampling in critical care. Adoption of a direct causal framework may help better assess mechanistic processes, aid design of future studies, and guide clinical decision making using routine data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据