4.7 Article

Dual Biochemically Breakable Drug Carriers from Programmed Telechelic Homopolymers

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 4313-4325

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01113

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, InnovaciOn y Universidades [MAT2017-82669-R]
  2. FPI [BES-2015-072662]
  3. Serra Hunter Programme of the Government of Catalonia
  4. Miguel Servet Program from Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CPII13/00017]
  5. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias from Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  6. European Union (ERDF/ESF, `Investing in your future') [PI18/00343]
  7. DiputaciOn General de Aragon [B25_20R]
  8. Centro de InvestigaciOn Biomedica en Red en Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd)
  9. National Science Foundation [DMR1066116, DMR-1807127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Well-defined hydrophilic telechelic dibromo poly(triethylene glycol monomethyl ether acrylate)s were prepared by single-electron transfer living radical polymerization employing a hydrophobic difunctional initiator containing acetal and disulfide linkages. Although the resulting homopolymers have low hydrophobic contents (<8.5 wt % of the entire structure), they are able to self-assemble in water into nanoscale micellelike particles via chain folding. Acetal and disulfide linkages were demonstrated to be keystone units for their dual stimuli-responsive behavior under biochemically relevant conditions. Their site-selective middle-chain cleavage under both acidic pH and reductive conditions splits the homopolymer into two equal-sized fragments and results in the breakdown of the nanoassemblies. The drug loading/delivery potential of these nanoparticles was investigated using curcumine combining in vitro drug release, cytotoxicity, and cellular uptake studies with human cancer cell lines (HT-29 and HeLa). Importantly, this strategy may be extended to prepare innovative nanoplatforms based on hydrophilic homopolymers or random copolymers for intelligent drug delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据