Concentration-dependent Differences in Urinary Iodine Measurements Between Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry and the Sandell-Kolthoff Method

A large amount of historical data regarding urinary iodine concentration (UIC) were measured with the Sandell-Kolthoff (S-K) method for iodine nutrition surveillance. The congruence in urinary iodine measurements between inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and the S-K method has been debated. A total of 2064 adult urine samples were included in the present study. The UIC measurement results obtained simultaneously by standardized ICP-MS and the S-K method were analyzed. The UIC obtained with ICP-MS was significantly higher than that obtained with the S-K method (158 mu g/L vs. 148 mu g/L,p< 0.001). The Bland-Altman difference plot showed a small but significant mean difference of 6.12 mu g/L between the two methods. The stratified analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was higher in the UIC < 300 mu g/L group than the UIC >= 300 mu g/L group (0.93 vs. 0.88,p= 0.0001). The mean difference between the S-K and ICP-MS methods was positively correlated with the UIC. The ICP-MS and S-K methods were comparable when the UIC was less than 300 mu g/L; however, UIC values between 300 and 600 mu g/L should be compared with caution after considering the research objective. We do not suggest comparing UICs obtained from the ICP-MS and S-K methods in iodine monitoring studies if the UIC is greater than 600 mu g/L.

Automated summary

The study compared the urinary iodine concentrations measured by ICP-MS and S-K methods, revealing that the methods are comparable when the UIC is less than 300 μg/L but caution should be taken when comparing UIC values between 300 and 600 μg/L. It is not recommended to compare UICs obtained from ICP-MS and S-K methods if the UIC exceeds 600 μg/L in iodine monitoring studies.