4.5 Article

Protective Effect of Boric Acid and Omega-3 on Myocardial Infarction in an Experimental Rat Model

期刊

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
卷 199, 期 7, 页码 2612-2620

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-020-02360-z

关键词

Myocardial infarction; Boric acid; Omega-3; Electrocardiography (ECG); Rat model

资金

  1. Eskisehir Osmangazi University [ESOGU-BAP 2014-620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the cardiac protective effect of boric acid and omega-3 against myocardial infarction, potentially due to the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and natriuretic peptides in rats. Results demonstrated that boric acid and omega-3 have protective effects on MI by reducing inflammation and cardiac damage.
Boric acid and omega-3 are used as essential elements for both animal and human health. Many researchers have shown these beneficial effects on cardiac and inflammatory markers. This study aims to evaluate cardiac protective effect of boric acid and omega-3 against MI (myocardial infarction), probably due to the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines of natriuretic peptides in rats. Fifty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: control, MI, MI+boric acid, MI+omega-3, and MI+boric acid+omega-3. Saline solution (2 ml/day), omega-3 (800 mg/kg/day), and boric acid (100 mg/kg/day)+omega-3 (800 mg/kg/day) were orally administered to the relevant groups throughout the 28 days. To constitute the MI model, the rats were exposed to isoproterenol-HCl (ISO) (200 mg/kg, S.C.) on the 27th and 28th. In the MI group, serum levels of CK-MB, BNP, and TNF-alpha are increased significantly. Also, ST waves and heart rates were higher in the MI than the control. These results demonstrate that biochemical results healed in MI+boric acid, MI+omega-3, and MI+boric acid+omega-3 groups compared MI group. ECG and light microscope results supported the findings as well. The statistical analysis showed that boric acid and/or omega-3 has protective effects on cellular damage in MI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据