4.7 Review

Navigating the Social Environment in Adolescence: The Role of Social Brain Development

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 109-118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome
  2. Jacobs Foundation
  3. University of Cambridge
  4. Wellcome grant [WT107496/Z/15/Z]
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. MRC [1764919] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Successful navigation of the social environment during adolescence depends on social cognitive processes such as mentalizing and resistance to peer influence. However, heightened susceptibility to peer influence and hypersensitivity to social rejection in adolescents can lead to risky behavior. Interventions aimed at improving prosocial behavior and emotion regulation abilities hold promise in reducing the risk of poor mental health in adolescents.
Successful navigation of the social environment is dependent on a number of social cognitive processes, including mentalizing and resistance to peer influence. These processes continue to develop during adolescence, a time of significant social change, and are underpinned by regions of the social brain that continue to mature structurally and functionally into adulthood. In this review, we describe how mentalizing, peer influence, and emotion regulation capacities develop to aid the navigation of the social environment during adolescence. Heightened susceptibility to peer influence and hypersensitivity to social rejection in adolescence increase the likelihood of both risky and prosocial behavior in the presence of peers. Developmental differences in mentalizing and emotion regulation, and the corticosubcortical circuits that underpin these processes, might put adolescents at risk for developing mental health problems. We suggest how interventions aimed at improving prosocial behavior and emotion regulation abilities hold promise in reducing the risk of poor mental health as adolescents navigate the changes in their social environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据