4.5 Article

Endowing antifouling properties on metal substrata by creating an artificial barrier layer based on scalable metal oxide nanostructures

期刊

BIOFOULING
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 766-782

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2020.1811238

关键词

Anti-biofouling; industrial metal; artificial barrier layer; wettability

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program - Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A1A4A1012950, 2017R1A2B4008028, 2019R1A2C2004607]
  2. Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Endowment Grant [PES9320]
  3. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [PES9320] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4008028] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, by creating different types of artificial barrier layer against bacterial attachment, anti-biofouling properties were endowed on three metallic surfaces - aluminum, stainless steel and titanium. To each metallic surface, a tailored chemical oxidation process was applied to grow scalable oxide structures with an additional appropriate coating, resulting in three different types of anti-biofouling barrier, a thin water film, an air layer and an oil layer. Fluorescence images of the attached bacteria showed that the water layer improved the anti-biofouling performance up to 8-12 h and the air layer up to 12-24 h, comparable with the lifetime of the air layer. In comparison, the oil layer exhibited the best anti-biofouling performance by suppressing the fouled area by < 10% up to 72 h regardless of the substratum type. The present work provides simple, low-cost, scalable strategies to enhance the anti-biofouling performance of industrially important metallic surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据