4.4 Article

Spectroscopic Identification of Peptide Chemistry in the Caulobacter crescentus Holdfast

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 59, 期 37, 页码 3508-3516

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00625

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterium Caulobacter crescentus is known to attach irreversibly to underwater surfaces by utilizing an adhesive structure called the holdfast, which exhibits the greatest known adhesive strength of any organism. The very small size of the holdfast (similar to 400 nm wide and similar to 40 nm high) has made direct chemical analysis difficult, and its structure remains poorly understood. In this study, we employ spectroscopic techniques, including attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, to probe holdfast chemistry. The data indicate the presence of a peptide signal within the holdfast polymer. By comparing the ATR-IR spectrum of the holdfast to peptidoglycan spectra from other bacterial species, we demonstrate the similarity of the holdfast chemistry to that of peptidoglycan, suggesting peptide cross-linking may play a role in holdfast architecture. To probe the molecular groups at the interface, surface-sensitive sum frequency generation spectroscopy was used to show that aromatic and hydroxyl groups related to this protein content at the adhesive interface could be playing a crucial role in adhesion. On the basis of these results, we propose a model of the holdfast architecture with similarities to the peptide cross-linking observed in the peptidoglycan polymer of the bacterial cell wall. These results not only provide information about the development of adhesives that could be based on holdfast chemical architecture but also reveal a potentially yet unexplored biosynthetic pathway in holdfast synthesis that has not yet been revealed by genetic approaches, thereby opening up a potentially new avenue of research in holdfast synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据