4.4 Review

Zooming in on protein-RNA interactions: a multi-level workflow to identify interaction partners

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 1529-1543

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20191059

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [RIBOMYLOME_309545, ASTRA_855923]
  2. European Union [754490, IASIS_727658, INFORE_825080]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BFU2017-86970-P]
  4. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions between proteins and RNA are at the base of numerous cellular regulatory and functional phenomena. The investigation of the biological relevance of non-coding RNAs has led to the identification of numerous novel RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). However, defining the RNA sequences and structures that are selectively recognised by an RBP remains challenging, since these interactions can be transient and highly dynamic, and may be mediated by unstructured regions in the protein, as in the case of many non-canonical RBPs. Numerous experimental and computational methodologies have been developed to predict, identify and verify the binding between a given RBP and potential RNA partners, but navigating across the vast ocean of data can be frustrating and misleading. In this mini-review, we propose a workflow for the identification of the RNA binding partners of putative, newly identified RBPs. The large pool of potential binders selected by in-cell experiments can be enriched by in silico tools such as catRAPID, which is able to predict the RNA sequences more likely to interact with specific RBP regions with high accuracy. The RNA candidates with the highest potential can then be analysed in vitro to determine the binding strength and to precisely identify the binding sites. The results thus obtained can furthermore validate the computational predictions, offering an all-round solution to the issue of finding the most likely RNA binding partners for a newly identified potential RBP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据