4.6 Article

The broad spectrum host-directed agent ivermectin as an antiviral for SARS-CoV-2?

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.042

关键词

Ivermectin; Antiviral; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Dengue virus; Zika virus

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Australia [APP1002486/APP1103050]
  2. National Breast Cancer Foundation [ECF-17-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ivermectin, originally approved for parasitic indications, has gained attention in recent years as a potential antiviral agent. Studies have shown its ability to inhibit a range of viruses, including HIV-1, dengue, Zika, and SARS-CoV-2. Numerous clinical trials are currently underway, with preliminary results indicating clinical benefits.
FDA approved for parasitic indications, the small molecule ivermectin has been the focus of growing attention in the last 8 years due to its potential as an antiviral. We first identified ivermectin in a high throughput compound library screen as an agent potently able to inhibit recognition of the nuclear localizing Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) integrase protein by the host importin (IMP) alpha/beta 1 heterodimer, and recently demonstrated its ability to bind directly to IMP alpha to cause conformational changes that prevent its function in nuclear import of key viral as well as host proteins. Cell culture experiments have shown robust antiviral action towards a whole range of viruses, including HIV-1, dengue, Zika and West Nile Virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Chikungunya, pseudorabies virus, adenovirus, and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Close to 70 clinical trials are currently in progress worldwide for SARS-CoV-2. Although few of these studies have been completed, the results that are available, as well as those from observational/retrospective studies, indicate clinical benefit. Here we discuss the case for ivermectin as a host-directed broad-spectrum antiviral agent, including for SARS-CoV-2. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据