期刊
AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 180-192出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12704
关键词
consumer participation; occupational justice; patient and public involvement; occupational therapy research; scoping review
The scoping review aimed to provide a snapshot of consumer engagement in occupational therapy health-related research published in the Australian Occupational Therapy Journal for a period of 5½ years, identifying limited instances of consumer collaboration or consumer-led research processes. The review emphasized the importance of comprehensive consumer-researcher partnerships, calling for occupational therapists to embrace consumer research partnerships as a demonstration of enabling and empowering consumers and communities, with collaboration from two consumers providing diverse and valuable perspectives.
Introduction: Consumer engagement in research is becoming an ethical, political, and moral imperative. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a snapshot of the current status of the emerging area of consumer engagement in occupational therapy health-related research, as published in theAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal. Methods: A scoping review was conducted of all health-related original research published in theAustralian Occupational Therapy Journalfor 51/2 years, plus Early View, as at June 2019. Eligible papers were examined for consumer engagement content which included any active choice or control by consumers, beyond being a research participant. A recognised six stage methodology was used with quantitative and qualitative data analysed. Two consumers collaborated in interpreting the data including finalising themes, leading theme naming, developing key discussion points, and producing recommendations. Results: Of the 123 eligible papers, 48 (39.02%) included consumer engagement. However, only two incorporated consumer engagement across all research phases-preparation, execution and translation. A total of 103 consumer engagement activities were charted and categorised across all papers. There were limited instances of consumer collaboration (14/103, 13.59%) or consumer-led research processes (15/103, 14.56%) reported. Four themes emerged:Parity in research partnerships; It's important to know the Who, What, When, How and So What of consumer involvement; Consumer engagement must be a two-way process-not a dead end street; and Meeting the challenge-being diverse and inclusive. Conclusion: Comprehensive consumer-researcher partnerships may not be common-place in health-related occupational therapy research in theAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal. This paper is a call to action. Occupational therapists must embrace consumer research partnerships as a demonstration of the key philosophies of enabling and empowering consumers and communities. Collaboration with two consumers in finalising data analysis, results interpretation and reporting added a diverse and valuable perspective.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据