4.7 Article

De novo sequencing and assembly analysis of transcriptome in the Sodom apple (Calotropis gigantea)

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1908-3

关键词

Sodom apple; Calotropis gigantea; High throughput sequencing; Transcriptome; Fiber biosynthesis; Secondary metabolite biosynthesis

资金

  1. Chinese Hunan Yunjin Group Co. Ltd.
  2. CGIAR Research Program 6: Forest, Trees and Agroforestry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Sodom apple (Calotropis gigantea), a member of the Asclepiadaceae family, is a large evergreen shrub native to continental Asia and northern Africa. As an important medicinal shrub and a fiber resource plant, there is an urgent need for developing molecular markers to facilitate breeding and genetic improvement of varieties. Results: In this study, using the Illumina high throughput sequencing technique we obtained about 45 million paired end sequencing reads, De novo assembled and generated a total of 133,634 transcripts with a mean of 1837.47 bp in length. Based on protein homology searches against available databases, a total of 21,851 unigenes were functionally annotated. In particular, many transcripts that encode for putative proteins involved in fiber and secondary metabolite biosynthesis were identified and analyzed. Key fiber genes identified were validated experimentally through Real-Time PCR technique. Various transcription factors involved in regulating plant response to abiotic stress were also identified. In addition, based on the unigene sequences assembled, 11,623 microsatellites loci were detected, which provide very useful resources for developing microsatellite molecular markers. Conclusion: This study is the first report on transcriptome information in the Calotropis species and provides rich gene transcript resources for conducting further studies on understanding the molecular basis of fiber and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, serving the genetic improvement and resource utilization in Calotropis plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据