4.6 Article

The GRAVITY young stellar object survey: III. The dusty disk of RY Lup

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 642, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038249

关键词

protoplanetary disks; stars: individual: RY Lup; circumstellar matter; stars: pre-main sequence; stars: variables: T Tauri, Herbig Ae/Be; stars: low-mass

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [18/SIRG/5597]
  2. LABEX OSUG@2020 (Investissements d'avenir) [ANR10LABX56]
  3. ANR of France [ANR-16-CE31-0013]
  4. European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 Framework Program via the ERC [832428]
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UIDB/00099/2020, SFRH/BSAB/142940/2018]
  6. Programme National de Physique Stellaire (PNPS) of CNRS/INSU - CEA
  7. CNES
  8. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [18/SIRG/5597] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Studies of the dust distribution, composition, and evolution of protoplanetary disks provide clues for understanding planet formation. However, little is known about the innermost regions of disks where telluric planets are expected to form.Aims. We aim constrain the geometry of the inner disk of the T Tauri star RY Lup by combining spectro-photometric data and interferometric observations in the near-infrared (NIR) collected at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer. We use PIONIER data from the ESO archive and GRAVITY data that were obtained in June 2017 with the four 8m telescopes.Methods. We use a parametric disk model and the 3D radiative transfer code MCFOST to reproduce the spectral energy distribution (SED) and match the interferometric observations. MCFOST produces synthetic SEDs and intensity maps at different wavelengths from which we compute the modeled interferometric visibilities and closure phases through Fourier transform.Results. To match the SED from the blue to the millimetric range, our model requires a stellar luminosity of 2.5 L-circle dot, higher than any previously determined values. Such a high value is needed to accommodate the circumstellar extinction caused by the highly inclined disk, which has been neglected in previous studies. While using an effective temperature of 4800 K determined through high-resolution spectroscopy, we derive a stellar radius of 2.29 R-circle dot. These revised fundamental parameters, when combined with the mass estimates available (in the range 1.3-1.5 M-circle dot), lead to an age of 0.5-2.0 Ma for RY Lup, in better agreement with the age of the Lupus association than previous determinations. Our disk model (that has a transition disk geometry) nicely reproduces the interferometric GRAVITY data and is in good agreement with the PIONIER ones. We derive an inner rim location at 0.12 au from the central star. This model corresponds to an inclination of the inner disk of 50 degrees, which is in mild tension with previous determinations of a more inclined outer disk from SPHERE (70 degrees in NIR) and ALMA (67 5 degrees) images, but consistent with the inclination determination from the ALMA CO spectra (55 +/- 5 degrees). Increasing the inclination of the inner disk to 70 degrees leads to a higher line-of-sight extinction and therefore requires a higher stellar luminosity of 4.65 L-circle dot to match the observed flux levels. This luminosity would translate to a stellar radius of 3.13 R-circle dot, leading to an age of 2-3 Ma, and a stellarmass of about 2 M-circle dot, in disagreement with the observed dynamical mass estimate of 1.3-1.5 M-circle dot. Critically, this high-inclination inner disk model also fails to reproduce the visibilities observed with GRAVITY.Conclusions. The inner dust disk, as traced by the GRAVITY data, is located at a radius in agreement with the dust sublimation radius. An ambiguity remains regarding the respective orientations of the inner and outer disk, coplanar and mildly misaligned, respectively.As our datasets are not contemporary and the star is strongly variable, a deeper investigation will require a dedicated multi-technique observing campaign.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据