4.6 Article

An observational argument against accretion in magnetars

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 643, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038948

关键词

pulsars: general; stars: magnetars; binaries: general

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-12-00423]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG-GZ WE 1312/53-1]
  3. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) [57405000]
  4. Academy of Finland [324550, 331951]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [331951, 324550, 331951] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  6. Russian Science Foundation [19-12-00423] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phenomenology of anomalous X-ray pulsars is usually interpreted within the paradigm of very highly magnetized neutron stars, also known as magnetars. According to this paradigm, the persistent emission of anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) is powered by the decay of the magnetic field. However, an alternative scenario in which the persistent emission is explained through accretion is also discussed in literature. In particular, AXP 4U 0142+61 has been suggested to be either an accreting neutron star or a white dwarf. Here, we rule out this scenario based on the observed X-ray variability properties of the source. We directly compare the observed power spectra of 4U 0142+61 and of two other magnetars, 1RXS J170849.0-400910 and 1E 1841-045 with that of the X-ray pulsar 1A 0535+262, and of the intermediate polar GK Persei. In addition, we include a bright young radio pulsar PSR B1509-58 for comparison. We show that, unlike accreting sources, no aperiodic variability within the expected frequency range is observed in the power density spectrum of the magnetars and the radio pulsar. Considering that strong variability is an established feature of all accreting systems from young stellar objects to super-massive black holes and the absence of the variability reports from other magnetars, we conclude that our results also indicate that magnetars, in general, are not powered by accretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据