4.7 Article

Numerical evaluation on multiphase flow and heat transfer during thermal stimulation enhanced shale gas recovery

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115554

关键词

Thermo-hydro-mechanical; Multi-phase flow; Thermal evaporation and sorption; Shale gas; Thermal recovery

资金

  1. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2019JQ-275]
  2. Scientific Research Program - Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [19JK0578]
  3. Postdoctoral Research Projects of Shaanxi Province [2018BSHTDZZ03]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120929, 2018M633549]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fully coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model in multiphase shale gas reservoirs is first developed and is then validated with analytical solutions and experimental result. Subsequently, the coupling responses are investigated to addressing mechanisms of gas recovery enhancement. Finally, a series of parameter sensitivity analyses are implemented to investigate the effect of parameters on gas recovery. The results indicate that gas production is strongly dependent on heating temperature, while the economic benefits should be evaluated further. The heating treatment for shale gas reservoirs not only rapidly desorbs the adsorbed gas, but also quickly evaporates the water in the pores within the shale, which removes the water lock effect and makes the desorbed gas produced smoothly. The parameters such as permeability, thermal conductivity, bottom-hole pressure, Langmuir volume, and entry capillary pressure also affect thermal recovery, which should be considered comprehensively to evaluate thermal recovery efficiency. Hydraulic fracturing enhances gas recovery at early-stage, and formation heat treatment can promote gas source supply at later-stage. Therefore, the combination of the two techniques can extend the life of shale gas wells and achieve effective and sustainable development of shale gas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据