4.7 Article

Heat transfer and flow characteristics of microchannels with solid and porous ribs

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115639

关键词

Microchannels; Solid and porous ribs; Heat transfer; Pressure drop; Field synergy principle

资金

  1. Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China [2019GGX101030]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2019MEE024]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018JC037]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, China [2018TB007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microchannel cooling technology is an effective method to solve heat dissipation problems caused by high power electronic devices. In this work, the heat transfer and flow characteristics of microchannels with solid and porous ribs are comprehensively investigated using numerical approaches. It is reported that the thermal performance of microchannels with solid and porous ribs are significantly better than those without any ribs. The field synergy principle is adopted to analyze the thermal performance, which proves that microchannels with porous ribs show a better synergy effect compared to those with solid ribs. On the other hand, the pressure drops and friction factors for all microchannels with solid ribs are larger than those with porous ribs. When solid ribs are replaced by porous ribs, the pressure drops reduce about 67%, 57% and 12% for the middle, symmetrical and staggered rib configurations, respectively. It can be found that vortices and recirculation flow come into being behind solid ribs. The thermal boundary layers are disrupted and redeveloped due to the intensified fluid mixing in porous regions, which facilitates the convective heat transfer. Finally, the comprehensive thermal and hydraulic performance is evaluated, and microchannels with symmetrical and staggered porous ribs exhibit the best comprehensive thermal and hydraulic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据