4.7 Article

Wafer-size VO2 film prepared by water-vapor oxidant

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 525, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146642

关键词

VO2 films; Metal-insulator transition; Wet oxidation; Wafer scale

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0401004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11574279, 11704362]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
  4. Major/Innovative Program of Development Foundation of Hefei Center for Physical Science and Technology
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622002]
  6. Anhui Laboratory of Advanced Photon Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growth of wafer-scale and uniform monoclinic VO2 film with excellent phase transition property was a challenge if considering the multivalent nature of vanadium atom and the various phase structures of VO2 compound. Direct oxidation of metallic vanadium film by annealing in oxygen gas or in air was suggested to be an easy way for VO2 film preparation, while the oxidation parameters including the gas pressure, gas flux and annealing temperature were extremely sensitive due to the critical preparation window. Here we proposed a facile water-vapor assisted thermal oxidation to produce wafer-scale VO2 films with good uniformity. Results indicated that by using the water vapor as the oxidizing agent, the temperature window for VO2 growth was greatly broadened. In addition, the obtained wafer-size VO2 film showed very uniform surface and sharp resistance change, which was attributed to the improved crystallinity and the high oxygen stoichiometry. The chemical reaction route was calculated based on Gibbs free energy, which confirmed the preferred growth of VO2 film by wet oxidation. Our results not only demonstrated that the water vapor could be used as a modest oxidizing agent, but also showed the unique advantage for large size VO2 film preparation, which was useful for practical devices applications in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据