4.8 Article

Control of intake boundary conditions for enabling clean combustion in variable engine conditions under intelligent charge compression ignition (ICCI) mode

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115297

关键词

Intelligent charge compression ignition (ICCI); Gasoline-diesel dual-fuel direct injection; Intake pressure; Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR); Intake temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51961135105, 51425602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a brand-new dual-fuel combustion mode called intelligent charge compression ignition (ICCI), the intake boundary conditions, including intake pressure, exhaust gas recirculation rate, and intake temperature, were modulated towards high-efficiency and clean combustion. A series of experiments were conducted in a modified single-cylinder engine. Commercial gasoline and diesel were respectively supplied to two decoupled common-rail direct injection systems. The experimental results show that intake pressure has a significant influence on ICCI combustion and emissions. The applicable intake pressure and gasoline ratio for ICCI steady operation under different engine loads are advised in this paper. At medium to high loads, exhaust gas recirculation is used to maintain stable combustion and delay combustion phasing. At 8 bar indicated mean effective pressure, slight exhaust gas recirculation (about 20% in this paper) could ease the combustion rate and adjust combustion phasing, optimizing heat release profiles. Gasoline double injection can further decrease hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions but increase particulate matter emissions, maintaining nitrogen oxide emissions near EURO VI standard. At low engine load, the intake temperature is enhanced to make up low in-cylinder reactivity. The cooperation control of fuel supply ratio, diesel injection timing, and intake temperature is conducted to increase combustion efficiency and decrease nitrogen oxide and particulate matter emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据