4.7 Article

Particle size effect of layered double hydroxide on the porosity of calcined metal oxide

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2020.105701

关键词

Hydrotalcite; Periclase; Particle size; Scanning electron microscopy; Transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Industrial Core Technology Development Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10063291]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure, porosity, and adsorption properties of mixed metal oxides (MMO) were investigated according to the physical property of the starting materials. Layered double hydroxides (LDH), the pristine MMO, were prepared to have the same composition of Mg2Al(OH)(6)(CO3)(0.5), but with different particle size. The prepared LDH were calcined at 400 degrees C to obtain MMO named CMO, HMO, and UMO corresponding to the pristine MMO synthesized by coprecipitation, hydrothermal treatment, and urea hydrolysis method, respectively. The particle sizes of CMO, HMO, and UMO were comparable to those of the pristine MMO in the order UMO HMO > CMO; on the other hand, the crystallite sizes were almost the same as each other, regardless of the pristine MMO. According to the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, we could suggest that a single particle of MMO was composed of smaller domains of metal oxide crystallite. Consequently, small MMO particle tended to have interparticulate macropore, while large MMO particle had more possibility of containing intraparticulate mesopores, which was cross-confirmed by the N-2 ad-sorption-desorption isotherms. Toluene and water vapor adsorption tests on three different MMO showed that the intraparticulate mesopores were advantageous to adsorb a variety of adsorbate. It was therefore concluded that MMO obtained by calcination of LDH would have high adsorption property when the pristine LDH has large particle dimension, thanks to the large portions of intraparticulate mesopores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据