4.7 Article

Low percolation threshold and balanced electrical and mechanical performances in polypropylene/carbon black composites with a continuous segregated structure

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 348-357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.031

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Electrical properties; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [51422305, 51421061]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 program) [2012CB025902]
  3. Innovation Team Program of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2014TD0002]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2014-2-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel continuous segregated structure was constructed in polypropylene (PP)/carbon black (CB) composites, to improve the electrical conductive performance and achieve a balance of the electrical conductivity and mechanical properties. Compared with traditional segregated structures reported in literature, PP matrix maintained a continuous structure instead of being separated completely by the electrical conductive fillers and CB particles formed a thorough conductive network in the continuous segregated PP/CB composites. A percolation threshold as low as 0.37 vol%, which is significantly lower than the percolation threshold of melt compounded PP/CB composites (2.75 vol%) and PP/polystyrene (PS)/CB composites (3.23 vol%) with a double percolation structure, was obtained because of the formation of the two-dimensional conductive network of CB particles. The mechanical performance tests showed that the tensile modulus, strength and elongation of break could be maintained well at CB contents around the percolation threshold. That is, with this novel continuous segregated structure, a balance of strength, toughness and electrical conductivity property can be achieved in conductive polymer composites. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据