4.7 Article

A stacked convolutional sparse denoising autoencoder model for underwater heterogeneous information data

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107391

关键词

Underwater heterogeneous information data; Blind denoising; Stacked sparse denoising autoencoder; Convolutional neural network; Deep learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41876110]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3072019CFT0602]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LQ19F020009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep learning denoising models can automatically extract underwater heterogeneous information data features to improve denoising performance through an internal network structure. In the present study, a novel stacked convolutional sparse denoising autoencoder (SCSDA) model was proposed in this paper to complete the blind denoising task of underwater heterogeneous information data. Specifically, for the first time, the stacked sparse denoising autoencoder (SSDA) was constructed by three sparse denoising autoencoders (SDA) to extract overcomplete sparse features. Then, the output of the last encoding layer of the SSDA was used as the input of the convolutional neural network (CNN) to further extract the deep features. Finally, in order to solve the lack of the pure underwater heterogenous information data during the acquisition and transmission process, the unrelated dataset was developed to simulate the underwater heterogeneous information data as the training set in proposed SCSDA model. Compared with the existing other algorithms, the experiment results demonstrate that the proposed SCSDA model combines the advantages of SSDA and CNN, which has great blind denoising ability. It can process faster and preserves more edge features of underwater heterogeneous information data. Also, it has a certain degree of robustness and effectiveness. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据