4.6 Review Book Chapter

Integrating Models of Self-Regulation

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 72
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 319-345

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-061020-105721

关键词

self-regulation; self-control; goals; cognitive control; personality; cognitive ability

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2019-05280]
  2. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [435-2019-0144]
  3. Banting Postdoctoral Research Fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article aims to integrate various models of self-regulation from different fields to refine the vast literature on the topic. By focusing on four key elements - level of analysis, conflict, emotion, and cognitive functioning - the authors identify points of convergence and areas of insufficient emphasis, providing suggestions for future research.
Self-regulation is a core aspect of human functioning that helps facilitate the successful pursuit of personal goals. There has been a proliferation of theories and models describing different aspects of self-regulation both within and outside of psychology. All of these models provide insights about self-regulation, but sometimes they talk past each other, make only shallow contributions, or make contributions that are underappreciated by scholars working in adjacent areas. The purpose of this article is to integrate across the many different models in order to refine the vast literature on self-regulation. To achieve this objective, we first review some of the more prominent models of self-regulation coming from social psychology, personality psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. We then integrate across these models based on four key elements-level of analysis, conflict, emotion, and cognitive functioning-specifically identifying points of convergence but also points of insufficient emphasis. We close with prescriptions for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据