Surgical Techniques in Management of Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis in Children

Background. Multiple techniques exist for the repair of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), but given the lesion's rarity, analyses comparing the efficacy of each repair have been limited. Methods. A retrospective review of all children at a single institution who underwent repair of SVAS from June 1995 to May 2019 was performed. Anatomic and physiologic measurements across time points were compared between 2 predominant surgical techniques. Time-to-event outcomes were compared using the log-rank test. Results. SVAS was repaired in 89 patients, by using a single-patch in 31 (35%) and the Doty repair in 58 (65%). Median age at operation was 2.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0 to 6.8 years), with median follow-up of 5.8 years (IQR, 1.8 to 10.7 years). Reoperation was required in 8 (9%) patients at a median of 1.5 years postoperatively (IQR, 0.3 to 4.8 years). There was 1 death after multiple reinterventions. The change from the preoperative to the postoperative sinotubular junction z-score was greater for patients after Doty repair (median change +2.5; IQR, 1.5, 4.1) than for patients after single-patch repair (median change +0.8; IQR, -0.1, 2.1; P = .001). Freedom from reoperation was longer for patients after Doty repair than after the single-patch technique (P = .008). Conclusions. The Doty repair provides longer freedom from reoperation after supravalvular aortic stenosis repair compared with a single-patch technique, likely through a greater increase in the sinotubular junction at the time of initial operation. (C) 2021 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Automated summary

A retrospective study compared the outcomes of two surgical techniques for repairing SVAS, finding that patients who underwent the Doty repair had a greater change in the sinotubular junction and longer freedom from reoperation.