4.7 Article

Assessment of structural chromosomal instability phenotypes as biomarkers of carboplatin response in triple negative breast cancer: the TNT trial

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 58-65

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.475

关键词

metastatic triple negative breast cancer; carboplatin; genomic instability; allelic imbalance

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. Breast Cancer Now ( legacy charity Breakthrough Breast Cancer) [CRUK/07/012, KCL-BCN-Q3]
  3. Myriad Genetics, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that patients with triple negative breast cancer who had certain measures of structural chromosomal instability and lacked high-level amplifications benefited more from carboplatin treatment compared to docetaxel within the TNT trial.
Background: In the TNT trial of triple negative breast cancer (NCT00532727), germline BRCA1/2 mutations were present in 28% of carboplatin responders. We assessed quantitative measures of structural chromosomal instability (CIN) to identify a wider patient subgroup within TNT with preferential benefit from carboplatin over docetaxel. Patients and methods: Copy number aberrations (CNAs) were established from 135 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary carcinomas using Illumina OmniExpress SNP-arrays. Seven published [allelic imbalanced CNA (AiCNA); allelic balanced CNA (AbCNA); copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (CnLOH); number of telomeric allelic imbalances (NtAI); BRCA1-like status; percentage of genome altered (PGA); homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores] and two novel [Shannon diversity index (SI); high-level amplifications (HLAMP)] CIN-measurements were derived. HLAMP was defined based on the presence of at least one of the top 5% amplified cytobands located on 1q, 8q and 10p. Continuous CIN-measurements were divided into tertiles. All nine CIN-measurements were used to analyse objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Patients with tumours without HLAMP had a numerically higher ORR and significantly longer PFS in the carboplatin (C) than in the docetaxel (D) arm [56% (C) versus 29% (D), P-HLAMP,P-quiet = 0.085; PFS 6.1 months (C) versus 4.1 months (D), P-interaction/HLAMP = 0.047]. In the carboplatin arm, patients with tumours showing intermediate telomeric NtAI and AiCNA had higher ORR [54% (C) versus 20% (D), P-NtAI,P-intermediate = 0.03; 62% (C) versus 33% (D), P-AiCNA,P-intermediate = 0.076]. Patients with high AiCNA and PGA had shorter PFS in the carboplatin arm [3.4 months (high) versus 5.7 months (low/intermediate); and 3.8 months (high) versus 5.6 months (low/intermediate), respectively; P-interaction/AiCNA = 0.027, P-adj.interaction/AiCNA = 0.125 and P-interaction/PGA = 0.053, P-adj.interaction/PGA = 0.176], whilst no difference was observed in the docetaxel arm. Conclusions: Patients with tumours lacking HLAMP and demonstrating intermediate CIN-measurements formed a subgroup benefitting from carboplatin relative to docetaxel treatment within the TNT trial. This suggests a complex and paradoxical relationship between the extent of genomic instability in primary tumours and treatment response in the metastatic setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据