4.5 Article

Identification of genes related to intramuscular fat independent of backfat thickness in Duroc pigs using single-step genome-wide association

期刊

ANIMAL GENETICS
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 108-113

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/age.13012

关键词

BF; duroc; IMF; P-value; ssGWAS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31872321, 31772552, 31972534]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a single-step GWAS on 950 Duroc pigs and identified genomic loci that may affect intramuscular fat (IMF) without changing backfat thickness (BF). Specific genetic variants were found to potentially improve IMF without altering BF, indicating valuable targets for molecular breeding of IMF in Duroc pigs.
Intramuscular fat (IMF) is an important meat-quality trait of pigs, which influences pork's shearing force, hydraulics, tenderness and juicy flavor. However, to achieve a higher percentage of lean meat, pigs with lower backfat thickness (BF) are intensively selected for, which may lead to a reduction in pork quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to locate loci that affect IMF without changing BF. A single-step GWAS was performed on 950 Duroc pigs genotyped by a 50K SNP chip in order to detect genomic variants relevant to IMF and BF. The significant SNPs detected were afterwards divided into a BF subset (seven SNPs), an IMF subset (11 SNPs) and a subset of both traits (12 SNPs), according to theirP-value and LD. After SNP and QTL annotation, our results indicated that SSC1: 167938652, 166363826, 164829874 and 167171587 might be associated with IMF without changing BF. In the subset of both traits, we found that the combined effect of ALGA0006602 (SSC1: 159538854) and 12784636 (SSC1: 160773437) might improve the IMF without changing BF. Our gene annotation result showed thatTLE3,ITGA11,SMAD6,PAQR5and [RNF152(A/G)x MC4R(A/A)] genes might affect IMF independently of BF. We believe that the SNPs and genes identified in this study will be valuable for the future molecular breeding of IMF in Duroc pigs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据