4.8 Article

Structural Characterization of N-Linked Glycans in the Receptor Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and their Interactions with Human Lectins

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 52, 页码 23763-23771

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202011015

关键词

glycan; lectin; molecular recognition; receptor binding domain; SARS-CoV2

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC-2017-AdG) [788143-RECGLYCANMR]
  2. Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience [200077]
  3. Agencia Estatal Investigacion of Spain (AEI) [RTI2018-094751-B-C21, RTI2018-095700-B-I00, PGC2018-098996-B-I00, RTI2018-099592-B-C22, RTI2018-101269-B-I00]
  4. Agencia Estatal Investigacion of Spain (AEI
  5. Ramon y Cajal)
  6. Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation [SEV-2016-0644]
  7. FundacAo para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portugal) [IF/00780/2015, PTDC/BIA-MIB/31028/2017, UCIBIO UIDB/04378/2020, 22161, PD/BD/142847/2018]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIA-MIB/31028/2017, PD/BD/142847/2018] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The glycan structures of the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV2 spike glycoprotein expressed in human HEK293F cells have been studied by using NMR. The different possible interacting epitopes have been deeply analysed and characterized, providing evidence of the presence of glycan structures not found in previous MS-based analyses. The interaction of the (RBDC)-C-13-labelled glycans with different human lectins, which are expressed in different organs and tissues that may be affected during the infection process, has also been evaluated by NMR. In particular,N-15-labelled galectins (galectins-3, -7 and -8 N-terminal), Siglecs (Siglec-8, Siglec-10), and C-type lectins (DC-SIGN, MGL) have been employed. Complementary experiments from the glycoprotein perspective or from the lectin's point of view have permitted to disentangle the specific interacting epitopes in each case. Based on these findings, 3D models of the interacting complexes have been proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据