4.8 Article

Disease-Associated Tau Phosphorylation Hinders Tubulin Assembly within Tau Condensates

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 726-730

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202011157

关键词

IDP; liquid-liquid phase separation; NMR spectroscopy; phosphorylation; tau

资金

  1. ERC [787679-LLPS-NMR]
  2. DFG [SPP2191, DFG ZW 71/9-1, SFB860, DFG Ma 563/14-1]
  3. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorylation of tau at specific epitopes can affect its ability to nucleate microtubule bundles during LLPS, while phosphorylation at other sites does not inhibit tubulin assembly from tau droplets. This suggests that IDP phosphorylation may be a widely used mechanism for regulating condensate-mediated cytoskeletal assembly.
Cellular condensation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) allows dynamic compartmentalization and regulation of biological processes. The IDP tau, which promotes the assembly of microtubules and is hyperphosphorylated in Alzheimer's disease, undergoes LLPS in solution and on the surface of microtubules. Little is known, however, about the influence of tau phosphorylation on its ability to nucleate microtubule bundles in conditions of tau LLPS. Herein, we show that unmodified tau as well as tau phosphorylated at disease-associated epitopes condense into liquid-like droplets. Although tubulin partitioned into and reached high concentrations inside all tau droplets, it was unable to grow into microtubules form the inside of droplets formed by tau phosphorylated at the AT180 epitope (T231/S235). In contrast, neither phosphorylation of tau in the repeat domain nor at its tyrosine residues inhibited the assembly of tubulin from tau droplets. Because LLPS of IDPs has been shown to promote different types of cytoskeletal assembly, our study suggests that IDP phosphorylation might be a broadly used mechanism for the modulation of condensate-mediated cytoskeletal assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据