4.8 Article

Tailoring Crystal Facets of Metal-Organic Layers to Enhance Photocatalytic Activity for CO2 Reduction

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 409-414

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202011068

关键词

crystal engineering; crystal facet tuning; heterogeneous catalysis; metal– organic layers; photocatalytic CO2 reduction

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2017YFA0700104]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21931007, 21790052, 21861001]
  4. 111 Project of China [D17003]
  5. Science AMP
  6. Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Education Commission for Higher Education [2018KJ129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different crystal facets in metal and metal oxide nanocrystals often exhibit varied catalytic performances, whereas this phenomenon is rarely seen in metal-organic frameworks. A nickel metal-organic layer with rich (100) crystal facets demonstrates significantly higher photocatalytic CO2-to-CO activity compared to the one with rich (010) crystal facets and its bulky counterpart, due to synergistic catalysis on the surface enabling more favorable energetics in CO2 reduction.
It is common that different crystal facets in metal and metal oxide nanocrystals display different catalytic performances, whereas such phenomena have been rarely documented in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Herein, we demonstrate for the first time that a nickel metal-organic layer (MOL) exposing rich (100) crystal facets (Ni-MOL-100) shows a much higher photocatalytic CO2-to-CO activity than the one exposing rich (010) crystal facets (Ni-MOL-010) and its bulky counterpart (bulky Ni-MOF), with a catalytic activity up to 2.5 and 4.6 times more active than Ni-MOL-010 and bulky Ni-MOF, respectively. Theoretical studies reveal that the two coordinatively unsaturated Ni-II ions with a close distance of 3.50 angstrom on the surface of Ni-MOL-100 enables synergistic catalysis, leading to more favorable energetics in CO2 reduction than that of Ni-MOL-010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据