4.8 Article

The Relative Thermodynamic Stability of Diamond and Graphite

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 1546-1549

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202009897

关键词

density-functional calculations; diamond; graphite; phase stability; thermodynamics

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Dalhousie University through the Clean Technology Research Institute
  3. Government of Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship)
  4. German Science Foundation (DFG) [VE 265-14/2]
  5. Government of Russian Federation [220, 14.Z50.31.0038]
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) of Portugal [UIDB/00081/2020]
  7. FCT-I.P.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies using density-functional theory calculations and high-accuracy calorimetric experiments have revealed that graphite is more thermodynamically stable than diamond at ambient pressure, with stability being driven by enthalpy at low temperatures and entropy at higher temperatures. DFT calculations showed good agreement with experimental results, providing revised values for the standard thermodynamic functions of diamond.
Recent density-functional theory (DFT) calculations raised the possibility that diamond could be degenerate with graphite at very low temperatures. Through high-accuracy calorimetric experiments closing gaps in available data, we reinvestigate the relative thermodynamic stability of diamond and graphite. For T400 K, graphite is always more stable than diamond at ambient pressure. At low temperatures, the stability is enthalpically driven, and entropy terms add to the stability at higher temperatures. We also carried out DFT calculations: B86bPBE-25X-XDM//B86bPBE-XDM and PBE0-XDM//PBE-XDM results overlap with the experimental -T Delta S results and bracket the experimental values of Delta H and Delta G, displaced by only about 2x the experimental uncertainty. Revised values of the standard thermodynamic functions for diamond are Delta H-f(o)=-2150 +/- 150 J mol(-1), Delta S-f(o)=3.44 +/- 0.03 J K-1 mol(-1) and Delta(f)G(o)=-3170 +/- 150 J mol(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据