4.8 Article

Tunable-Emission Amorphous Room-Temperature Phosphorescent Polymers Based on Thermoreversible Dynamic Covalent Bonds

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 7, 页码 3459-3463

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012298

关键词

dynamic covalent bonds; emission regulation; organic room-temperature phosphorescence; photophysics; polymers

资金

  1. NSFC [21788102, 22020102006, 21722603, 21871083]
  2. Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [20XD1421300]
  3. Shu Guang project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  4. Shanghai Education Development Foundation [19SG26]
  5. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2017-01-07-00-02-E00010]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study synthesized polymers that can undergo reversible transformation through dynamic covalent bonds, showing decent RTP emission performance. Among them, the poly-Br-An solid has an absolute phosphorescence quantum yield reaching up to 12%. This research provides a new approach for the rational design and synthesis of tunable-emission organic RTP materials via dynamic covalent bonds.
Pure organic room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) materials are useful for photoelectric, biochemical devices, and bioimaging sensors. In the last few years, dynamic covalent chemistry has aroused substantial attention as it offers a way to create intelligent materials with feedback and response functions. Through a Diels-Alder reaction, a [4+2] cycloaddition reaction between dienes and dienophiles, three polymers were synthesized that can be reversibly transformed by thermally reversible dynamic covalent bonds. All polymers show decent RTP emission with different colors. For the poly-Br-An solid, the absolute phosphorescence quantum yield reaches up to 12 %. This study provides a new method for the rational design and synthesis of tunable-emission organic RTP materials via dynamic covalent bonds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据